Ways
of Collaboration between Politics and Media
Media is called
the fourth estate of the political force. Thomas Carlyle attributed
the origin of the term to Edmund Burke[1], Thomas Carlyle in his book On Heroes and
Hero Worship indicated: “Burke said there were Three Estates in Parliament;
but, in the Reporters’ Gallery yonder, there sat a Fourth Estate more important
far than they all.”[2]
Media plays an
important role in politics indeed, there are mainly two ways of collaboration
between politics and media as follows:
First of all,
political media. Political media refers to the communication way managed,
ruled, and even owned by political entities, meant to propagate views of the
certain entity. For instance, in China, People’s Daily is the official
newspaper of the Chinese Communist Party. The function of political media is
posting information.
In addition, news
conference (press conference) is also a way of collaboration, which aims at
information transferring. A news conference or press conference is a media
event in which government invites journalists to hear them speak and, most
often, ask questions.
What do
demonstrations on city streets in the Philippines in 2001, the election of the
United States in 2008, revocation of the results of the fraudulent elections in
Moldavia in 2009, the M-15 movement with their camps and demonstrations in
Spain in 2011, and the “Occupy Wall Street” movement that started in New York,
also in 2011, all have in common?[3]
They have all used
new media to help organize such protests and mobilize their responsible agents.
Yet these were much more than just about arranging a party: they all greatly
exploited new media to establish communication networks and move towards their
objectives, which seems to be unbelievable for traditional media.[4]
Today’s new media
have helped make real the idea of a “global village”, first put forward by
communications theorist Marshall McLuhan in the 1960s, and suggests the claims
of a “flat world” by twenty-first century essayist Thomas L. Friedman are true.[5]
According to Friedman, personal computers and the speed of the optic cable in
the transfer of information have marked the modern revolution and almost
removed the limitations of time and space.
New media’s quick
development into an important way to influence society is part of the
advancement of information and communication technologies.
The first
noteworthy trend has been the evolution of the Internet. The modern Internet is
often called “Web 2.0”. The central components of Web 2.0 are the different
social media and social web communities. Invented by Tim O’Reilly in 2005, the
term “Web 2.0” is just a name for the evolution of Internet-based
communications, and it shows that networking and electronic interaction have
advanced to the next level.[6]
The quick
development of mobile technology and different mobile terminals has been
important for the creation and use of social media. A modern, well-equipped
smartphone can be a pocket-sized mega-studio.
The applications
and services of information and communications technology are merging together
more and more. An ubiquitous presence, the different hardware and services we
use now contain a new kind of “intelligence”, where these machines and services
communicate with each other without any particular action by the user.[7]
In accordance with
Bruno (2014), new media refers to on-demand access to content anytime, anywhere,
on any digital device, as well as interactive user feedback, and creative
participation. Another aspect of new media is the real-time generation of new
and unregulated content.[8]
Collaboration
between Politics and Weibo
Weibo is a free,
internet-based microblogging service, on which users can send short messages
with only 140-character to each other. Its use is based on quick exchanges of
thoughts and information between friends, acquaintances, and all the users of
the Weibo platform. According to Sun.S(2012), Weibo has more than 300 million
users, over 100 million posts generated every day.
As a type of new
media, Weibo inherits the traditional political functions of media. Besides, due
to the fast, cross-distance as well as mutual direction communication, Weibo
created new ways for collaboration which seems to be impossible for traditional
media. [9]Thus,
Weibo has significant advantages in building collaboration with politics as
follows:
Firstly, according
to Annual Report of Official Weibo (2013)[10],
up to 31st of October, 2013, there are 100151 official accounts,
66830 organizational accounts and 33321 individual accounts included. (Organizational
accounts means accounts opened, ruled by a certain department while individual
accounts means accounts belongs to an individual who is an official working in
government, both of organizational accounts and individual accounts can be
considered as official accounts.) Compared with the same period 2012, it grew by
60%. In ministerial level in China, for example, @外交小灵通,@中国旅游,@央行微博,@商务微新闻 are owned by Foreign Ministry, National Tourism Administration,
Central Bank and Ministry of Commerce respectively. After verification being
checked by Sina, the official Weibo will get a “V” (verification) next to its
account, and detailed identity verification about “V” can be seen on the same
page too. (Figure 1) Therefore, the government owns a new way for posting
information. The content is even richer than its other official sources. For
instance, the content of @中国旅游, the official account of National
Tourism Administration, can be divided into three main parts and nine
branches. (Figure 2)
Figure 1: Official
Weibo of National Tourism Administration with V Verification[11]
Source: http://weibo.com/p/1001062058584790/home?from=page_100106&mod=TAB#place
Official Weibo
|
Official Website
|
||
Government
Affairs
|
Industrial
Standard
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Laws & Regulations
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Statistical Data
|
-
|
Yes
|
|
Financial Budget
|
-
|
Yes
|
|
News
|
Industrial News
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Local News
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Public Services
|
Scenic Spots
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Scenery Pictures
|
Yes
|
Yes, only a few
|
|
Travel Tips
|
Yes
|
-
|
|
Experience
Sharing
|
Yes
|
-
|
|
Seasonal News
|
Yes
|
-
|
Figure 2: Comparison of Official Weibo and Website of National Tourism Administration[12]
Source: http://www.cnta.gov.cn/
Secondly, according to Hofstede (2010) China’s power distance index is very high[13], with a significant 80, (Figure 3) which means the society in China believes that inequalities amongst people are acceptable. The subordinate-superior relationship tends to be polarized and there is no defense against power abuse by superiors. Thus, in China, actually there is no or only a few upward communication ways. When official Weibo came, however, this situation has been changed. All users can make comments and repost the message from official Weibo, sometimes official Weibo may reply some of the comments. In this instance, interactions can be seen on the Weibo platform, which significantly benefits in building upward communication.
Figure 3: Culture Dimensions Results of China[14]
Source: http://geert-hofstede.com/china.html
Thirdly, Weibo shows a significant role in crisis management. On November 16, 2011, a school bus run by a private kindergarten collided head-on with a coal truck in Gansu province, China. 19 children were killed, as were 2 adults. The bus was originally with nine seats, but it had been modified to carry more passengers, and was severely overcrowded. 62 children were on board at the time of the crash, along with the 2 adults. The accident caused a great deal of outcry on the Chinese internet, with many netizens criticizing the government. Weizhong Liu, the provincial health department director, posted a Weibo at the first time. Later, @甘肃刘维忠,@微博甘肃,@甘肃省卫生厅,@庆阳市卫生局,@甘肃政府新闻办, ruled by the Provincial Health Department Director, Provincial Government of Gansu, Provincial Health Department, Health Department of Qingyang and Information Office of Provincial Government respectively, posted 312 related messages totally within the next 7 days including apologies[15], latest news, compensation schemes, mourning and reflection.(Figure 4) All official accounts were closely related to manage this issue, so the crisis management team was right selected. Those related messages helped the public knew the ongoing issues, in accordance with Alice and Michelle (2009), their responses fit the incident, thus they managed this crisis well. (Figure 5)
Weibo Account
|
Verification (V)
|
Date of Account Opened
|
Number of Followers
|
@甘肃刘维忠
|
Provincial Health Department Director
|
21 Jan, 2011
|
399394
|
@微博甘肃
|
Provincial
Government of Gansu
|
28 Jun, 2011
|
730030
|
@甘肃省卫生厅
|
Provincial Health Department
|
22 Aug, 2011
|
805285
|
@庆阳市卫生局
|
Health
Department of Qingyang
|
16 Nov, 2011
|
4072
|
@甘肃政府新闻办
|
Information Office of Provincial Government
|
27 May, 2011
|
702410
|
Figure 4: Official Weibo in Crisis Management in “11.16”[16]
Steps
|
Actions Encouraged To Be Done
|
Actions They Have Done
|
Comments on Their Actions
|
Assess the Incident
|
Adopt the customers’ point of view rather than
management’s perspective
|
“I have child too, I feel so sad, I don’t know how
to comfort you…” by @甘肃刘维忠
|
Good use of similarities and sympathy
|
Acknowledge the Problem
|
Avoid premature
statements related to the cause, focus on the process of investigation, and
prevent further harm
|
Made all reposts
and latest news public directly and transparently
|
Response
quickly/Communicated directly helps to avoid communication barrier
|
Formulate a Response
|
Evaluate the benefits and costs of the response in
terms of customer relationships over the long run
|
Apology/Promise to provide compensation to victims
and increase investments in education, especially in security
|
Conversations for commitment: to satisfy the
concerns of public[17]/
Comprehensive actions
|
Implement the Response
|
Align scandal
communications with customers’ perceptions of the brand’s function
|
Meeting Promises
|
Avoid reputation
loss
|
Fourthly, Weibo plays
an important role in supervision. [19]Most
of them were exposed by netizens, who found clues which led to broader
investigations. The name "Uncle Watch" is one of the highlights of Weibo
anti-corruption in 2012. “Uncle Watch”, Yang Dacai, a work safety official in
Shaanxi, who was sacked in September, 2012, after netizens posted photos of him
wearing luxury watches that he couldn't afford on his salary. Later, netizens
found many other pictures of him, which showed he had more than 5 luxury
watches. Also, in the same year, Cai Bin, an urban management official in
Guangdong was dismissed from his post after it was revealed online that he
owned 22 houses. In the light of Annual Report of Official Weibo (2012)[20]
by Shanghai Jiaotong University[21],
there were 15 well-known network anti-corruption cases, 6 cases of them
originally came from Weibo, and the other 9 cases were also pushed by Weibo due
to the large amount of reposts.[22]
Last but not
least, sometimes government also asks people for help through Weibo,
particularly in finding clues for criminal investigation. On Nov 23rd,
2010, a dead body of a little girl washed ashore. @厦门警方在线,the official Weibo of Xiamen Municipal
Public Security Bureau, posted a message to ask netizens provide clues if it
was possible. The horror of the girl arose public concern, thousands of people
reposted. @厦门警方在线 also timely updated the progress and
discussed the case with netizens on Weibo platform. Finally, with clues
provided by witnesses, the suspect was caught within 7 days. Besides, Weibo
also held a conference called mirco-Q&A, which is similar to press
conference. Guests will be invited to answer the questions from netizens
online.
Therefore, Weibo
created a comprehensive way which not only consists all traditional ways, but
also includes some new types of collaboration.
Conflicts
on Weibo
The collaboration,
to some degree, can be considered as a double-edged sword. Though the
collaborative practices between Weibo and politics seems to be good, due to the
diverse backgrounds netizens, quick response and cross time and distance
communication, conflicts also happens, even much easier and more frequent.
First of all, fake
information can spread faster and create more influence. For example, Weibo
benefits a lot in anti-corruption as I mentioned before, it also has its limits
and sometimes can do harm to innocent people. After the case of Cai Bin, a
Weibo revealed that Li Yunqing, a retired senior engineer in Guangzhou, owned
24 houses and was suspected of corruption. However, later investigation showed
that Li was neither a member of Communist Party of China nor an official of
government. Her houses came from successful business and hard working. The
incident left Li angry, as her personal information had been leaked to the
Internet. Zhang Youde, head of the Social Management School, Shanghai
University of Political Science and Law, said Internet muckrakers should take
legal responsibility if they cross the line and violate the privacy of others.
Zhang said legislation should be put in place to rein in the negative effects
brought to society by online anti-corruption. (2013)[23]
In addition, some
departments of government just “follow the trend” to create an official account
without managing the Weibo well. @衡水微旅,the official Weibo of Tourism Bureau of Hengshui (Figure
6) has only 20 posts and 1388 followers, which play an insignificant role in
communication. In Zhongshan, Guangdong, there are 57 official accounts with
verification based on a survey by 21cn, however, only 18 of them have more than
500 posts.[24] As
a result, the impact is limited. These kinds of inact accounts are called “Zombie
Weibo”. Similarly, some accounts post Weibo every day, but never response the
problems reported by people, or response without investigation. In the past we
don’t have such channels to communicate, but now we do have channels, it seems
that government is still not willing to communicate, which makes people much
angrier.
Figure 6:
Official Weibo of Tourism Bureau of Hengshui
Source: http://weibo.com/hengshuiweilv
Furthermore, official
Weibo shows an uneven development in regions, bureaus and hierarchies.
(1)Regions:
Figure 7 shows the
distribution of organizational accounts while Figure 8 indicates the
distribution of the number of posts. It can be clearly seen that Guangdong
ranked the first in both number of accounts and posts. Also, Jiangsu, Sichuan,
Shandong, Henan and Beijing did well. Qinghai and Tibet, however, needed
further development. In general, east coast is far more developed than the
rural western interior.
Figure 7: Bureaus
Distribution on Organizational Weibo
Source:
Annual Report of Official Weibo (2013)
Figure 8: Distribution
Map about Official Weibo
Source:
Annual Report of Official Weibo (2013)
(2)Bureaus:
Figure 9 provides
information about the bureaus distribution of organizational accounts. Youth
League, Public Security Bureau, Government and others took up a large percent
with significant 29.2%, 21.0%, 13.4% and 12.6% respectively. As for individual
accounts, top 4 remained the same. Some bureaus, which really mattered in daily
life of people, like Environmental Protection Administration, only accounted
for 0.8% in organizational accounts and 0.2% in individual accounts. Similarly,
the Discipline Committee, which should have been closely with people and
encouraged the clues reported by the public, also occupied with negligible 0.6%
and 0.4% both in organizational and individual accounts.
Figure 9: Bureaus
Distribution of Organizational Accounts
Source:
Annual Report of Official Weibo (2013)
Source:
Annual Report of Official Weibo (2013)
(3)Hierarchies:
Figure 11 and
Figure 12 demonstrated that the main forces of the official accounts including
organizational ones and individual ones are still lower level of the hierarchy.
Some people argued the rights to communicate directly to upper level, but from
my perspectives, I think the situation is acceptable, because lower level of
the hierarchy connects to our daily life closer.
Figure 11: Hierarchies
Distribution of Organizational Accounts
Source: Annual
Report of Official Weibo (2013)
Figure 12: Hierarchies
Distribution of Individual Accounts
Source:
Annual Report of Official Weibo (2013)
Finally, some
conflicts were made by the inappropriate actions by the official Weibo, for
example, when crisis happened, there were a large amount of abuses and queries,
the official Weibo closed the function of making comments or deleted negative
comments, which made people more unsatisfied.
To conclude, in
collaboration between politics and Weibo, actually it worked well in recent
years, but the developmental process cannot be finished one day, it takes time
to wipe out the “Zombie Weibo” and develops in balance. Therefore, the main
issue is that sometimes it cannot meet the expectation of people, and the
comments of official accounts are always full of abuses, and further conflicts
happen. Personally I think some netizens are not that rational, mutual
understanding can help.
Conflicts
Management on Weibo
According to B.
Hagemann and S. Stroope(2012)[25],
conflict management needs, among others: avoidance, ignore, taking turns,
apologize and postpone. All this actions are much easier on a new media like
Weibo compared with face-to-face relation. Besides, based on research by
Kirstie (2013), three paths to manage conflict are law-based system,
management-based system and participation-based system.[26]
In practice, the
conflicts management is divided into four aspects:
(1)Official
accounts
Both
organizational accounts and individual accounts are required to enhance their
abilities to manage Weibo and make full use of this communication channel,
“Zombie Weibo” needs to pay more attention in particular, because involvement
helps to establish a participation-based system. When facing questioning, the
most urgent thing is social management and public services, which can really
help to build creditability and reduce queries rather than rejecting all
negative comments. Besides, when fake information spreading, being transparent
and publish the results of investigation timely are the best ways to avoid
misunderstanding and conflicts. As for irrational abuses, just ignore them.
Apologizing can be used when conflicts or emergent issue happen.
(2)People
Supervision and
providing suggestions which contributes to make our government better are
everyone’s tasks. In fact, however, oftentimes netizens remain irrational as
many abuses are existing everywhere, thus I suggest that the netizens can try
to focus on the “cool topic” rather than the “hot topic” which means
emphasizing the fact instead of arguing different values and believes.[27]
In this situation, getting rid of stereotype helps. In addition, enhancing the
abilities to identify information which helps to avoid spreading fake
information.
(3)Weibo platform
Weibo platform is
responsible for building a better channel for communications between government
and the public. Personally I am really appreciate micro Q&A, which seems to
be an innovative way, and more micro Q&A can be held. Creating more
functions like micro Q&A which can help to communicate more equally and
conveniently and enhance mutual understanding to avoid conflicts is encouraged.
Also, when conflicts happen, as an intermediary, actions for making full use of
maintaining the harmonious platform, such as silencing or warning those who
abused, can be taken.
(4)Laws and
regulations
Law-based system
is important in managing conflicts. Weibo, together with new media, develops
quickly, the law-making process, however, doesn’t match to its development.
There was actually no any laws and regulations before, thus netizens are not
accountable for what they said. China has recently introduced new
regulation, under the new rules, people will be charged with defamation if
false information is reposted more than 500 times or viewed more than 5000
times.
Future
Trend
We can see an
upward trend both in number of official accounts and posts based on Annual
Report of Official Weibo. (2011, 2012 and 2013)[28]
As government transformation is required by the new generation of central
government, which refers to the priority of government is transforming from dictation
to democracy, service and responsibility. The collaborative practice between
politics and Weibo will be much closer and more frequent.
The number of
conflicts will increase as more official Weibo will appear in a short term, it
always takes time and efforts to build new accounts and meet people’s expectations.
When considering long-term situation, however, the number of conflicts will
reduce. Because for a long run, more and more organizations and individuals can
manage their accounts well which helps to establish trusts, and people will be
more rational.
Conflicts management
will also be easier, government has already realized the importance of
law-making, after completing law-making process, and accountability will be
established. The number of unreasonable abuses and fake information will be
reduced dramatically, which contributes to conflicts management. Also,
according to Gordon (1982)[29],
conflict-management ability has become more important, after realizing the
importance of this ability as well as enhancing the ability, official accounts
can manage conflicts more effectively and efficiently.
References
[1] Schultz, Julianne. Reviving the Fourth Estate.
Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press(1998)
[2] Carlyle,
Thomas. "Lecture V: The Hero as Man of Letters. Johnson, Rousseau,
Burns". On Heroes,
[3] Shirky, C. The Political Power of Social Media. Foreign
Affairs 2011(2011)
[4] T, Flew. New
Media: An Introduction. Oxford University Press(2007)
[5] Friedman, T. The World Is Flat 3.0: A brief History of
the Twenty-first Century(2007)
[6] Reilly, T. What is Web 2.0? - Design Patterns and
Business Models for the Next Generation of Software
[7] Arimatti,
A. Social Media – New Power of Political Influence. CES
[8] Schivinski, Bruno and Dabrowski, Dariusz. The Effect of
Social-Media Communication on Consumer Perceptions of Brands. Journal of
Marketing Communications(2014)
[9] 林俊.政务微博的媒介特征及功能运用.新闻战线
[10] 人民网舆情室,上海交通大学.2013年新浪政务微博报告(2013)
[11] http://weibo.com/p/1001062058584790/home?from=page_100106&mod=TAB#place
[13] Hofstede, Geert, Gert Jan Hofstede and Michael Minkov. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the
Mind(2010)
[14] http://geert-hofstede.com/china.html
[15] Barbara, K. When Should a Leader Apologize and When Not. Harvard
Business Review (2006)
[16] http://media.people.com.cn/n/2012/1107/c150617-19520550.html
[17] Donald, M and Charles, S. Promise-Based Management. Harvard Business
Review (2007)
[18] Alice,
M and Michelle, R. Let the Response Fit the Scandal: A Step-by-step Guide to
Tailoring Your Crisis Response. Harvard Business Review (2009)
[19] 陈力丹.舆论监督中的传媒责任.现代传播(2008)
[20] 人民网舆情室,上海交通大学.2012年新浪政务微博报告(2012)
[21] http://yuqing.sjtu.edu.cn/
[22] 邓遂.“微博问政”热潮的冷思考——当前政务微博发展存在的问题及对策分析.对外传播
[23]
章友德,朱晶晶.转型中国的网络反腐:现状、价值与趋势. 检察风云—创新社会管理理论专刊
(2013)
[24]
http://news.21cn.com/caiji/roll1/a/2014/0312/07/26670048.shtml
[25] B, Hagemann and S, Strpppe. Conflict Management: Lessons from
the Second Grade. American Society for Training and Development(2012)
[26] Kirstie, M. Workplace Conflict: Three Paths to Peace. IESE Insight
(2013)
[27] Amy, E and Diana, M. How to Manage Relationship Conflict. Rotman
Magazine (2008)
[28] 人民网舆情室,上海交通大学.2011年新浪政务微博报告(2011)
[29] Gordon, L. Managing Conflict in Today’s Organizations. Training and
Development Journal (1982)
Thanks for reading!
Thanks for reading!








